Thursday, May 14, 2015

Do you agree that most private companies are destined to collapse at some point?


They always get overshadowed by bigger companies.
Added (1). Just thought especially the tech stuff, take Nokia, as an example, I think anything private doesn't really work. I mean, I could mention McDonald's, but to me McDonald's is not exactly a company.
Added (2). It's difficult to make a country work based on privatization, and competition. There should be a particular legislation or regulatory body (international) for each product, like in the pharmaceutical world, we have a legislation where you have a body that controls the economy of the drug manufacturer, be it Pfizer or whatever, and then there are these small pseudogenerator companies that come into play, once there is an expiry of the generator company of the drug. This is healthy and moral
Added (3). competition because you achieve good quality drugs and you also promote research, although this could also be improved, and it is getting improved, as 50% effectiveness is enough for some particular diseases, such as cancer and those that are incurable. However, at the same time it's healthy because you don't demolish other firms, but you allow all to coexist, based on "examinations", e.g. If they pass the test or the exam, which is not so hard to pass, because you are given the "welfare", aka
Added (4). the tools, but you don't see this happening in corporations, or other types of worlds. E.g. You never see this in the tech world. It's more difficult to survive there, not to mention automobiles or other companies, e.g. Wine producers etc.
Added (5). @Flatulent, that was not point, I was thinking about companies such as Nokia, which have a large impact on the National Economy, some companies have international economic impact, that is what I was saying.
Added (6). I am pretty sure Facebook is not going to make it, Twitter is already replacing it. Myspace is completely forgotten if you think about it.
Added (7). The thing about the pharmaceutical world is that it is based on deontological practice, so that's more harmonised internationally and has many regulatory bodies, internationally, other companies don't have it. Private drugs are embodied in public systems, such as the NHS in the UK for example. I think this is a system that works pretty well and is efficient.
Added (8). Just was thinking out loud sorry. Been quiet for days. I am quite stressed:/

Read more: Do you agree that most private companies are destined to collapse at some point?